Close

Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Continue Find out more

07 Oct 2009
Data from a head-to-head crossover study evaluating FOSRENOL® and sevelamer published today

Shire plc (LSE: SHP, NASDAQ: SHPGY), the global specialty biopharmaceutical company, today announces the publication in Clinical Nephrology of findings from a head-to-head clinical study comparing the efficacy of two non-calcium based phosphate binders, FOSRENOL® (lanthanum carbonate) and sevelamer hydrochloride (Genzyme’s Renagel®) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on haemodialysis.

In this 12-week crossover study, patients (n=182) were randomized to receive either FOSRENOL or sevelamer for four weeks, and then switched to the alternative phosphate binder for the same period. Product doses were pre-defined to allow a direct efficacy comparison.  Doses were based on those used in previous clinical trials1,2 and established clinical practice.3

The study’s primary endpoint, change in serum phosphorus from baseline to end of treatment, was evaluated using several statistical analyses; the primary analysis used last observation carried forward (LOCF) for the intention to treat (ITT) population (n=174), meaning that if a patient dropped out of the study during treatment, their last post baseline serum phosphorus measurement was used as the end of treatment value. The pre-determined key secondary analysis assessed the completer population; defined as those patients who had completed four weeks’ treatment with both phosphate binders and had a serum phosphorus value at the end of treatment.4

The analysis of LOCF for the ITT population showed a numerically greater reduction in serum phosphorus with FOSRENOL (1.7mg/dL) versus sevelamer (1.4mg/dL), although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.113). In the completer population (n=119), considered to be the most clinically relevant population, FOSRENOL reduced serum phosphorus by 1.8mg/dL, compared with 1.3mg/dL for sevelamer, a statistically significant difference (p=0.007).  A statistically significant difference was also observed between the treatments at week 1 (p=0.024).4

Study investigators concluded that the statistically larger reduction within the completer group suggested that FOSRENOL may offer greater serum phosphorus reduction in CKD patients on haemodialysis.4

“This study is important, because up until now, there was no data comparing the relative efficacies of lanthanum carbonate and sevelamer,” said lead investigator Professor Stuart Sprague of Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

“The findings suggest that over four weeks of treatment, FOSRENOL may be a more effective binder of phosphate. Further research is now required to evaluate whether the trends observed in this crossover study are continued in the long term,” he added.

“The company’s investment in this study underscores Shire’s commitment to characterizing the differences of FOSRENOL and better understand its clinical potential,” said Arnaud Partiot, Senior Vice President, Clinical Research and Development, Shire.

Current clinical guidelines recommend targets for phosphorus and other biochemical values including calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) in patients with CKD undergoing dialysis.5 Sustained control within these ranges is associated with improved survival in patients starting dialysis.6 The level of achievement of the targets in clinical practice has been assessed in large studies such as DOPPS (Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study). Overall, they are modest with less than 50% of patients in the target range for phosphorus, calcium and PTH.7 Therefore, there is a need for more effective treatment strategies.

For further information please contact:

Matthew Cabrey (US) +1 484 595 8248
Caren Weintraub, Resolute Communications (US) +1 212 213 8181
Con Franklin, Resolute Communications (UK) +44 (0) 207 015 1354

Notes to Editors

About the Study

  • The Shire SPD405-319 study is a 12 week randomized, open-label crossover study conducted at multiple sites in the USA, Puerto Rico, Germany and the UK.
  • CKD patients aged over 18 years, undergoing haemodialysis 2-3 times per week for at least two months before screening, and not receiving treatment with FOSRENOL or sevelamer were included.
  • Following screening, patients (most receiving calcium-containing phosphate binders) entered a washout period of 2-3 weeks before assessment of biochemical parameters. Patients with serum phosphorus equal to or above 6.0 mg/dL and serum calcium equal to or above 8.4mg/dL were randomized (1:1 ratio) to receive FOSRENOL or sevelamer hydrochloride. Following 4 weeks’ treatment with FOSRENOL or sevelamer, patients underwent a second washout period and were switched to the alternative phosphate binder for a further 4 weeks.
  • Treatment was initiated at 2250mg/day for FOSRENOL and 4800mg/day for sevelamer. After week 1, doses were increased to 3000 mg/day for FOSRENOL and 6400mg/day for sevelamer.
  • In statistical analysis, the safety population was defined as all patients who took at least one dose of FOSRENOL or sevelamer. The ITT population included all patients who had received at least one dose of either study drug and had at least one valid post-dose serum phosphorus measurement. The completer population was defined as all patients who completed 4 weeks of treatment on both study drugs and had a valid serum phosphorus measurement at week 4 of each treatment period.

    Shire expresses its thanks to the study authors (Stuart Sprague, Edward Ross, Subrata Nath, Pinggao Zhang, Raymond Pratt and Rolfdieter Krause) for their participation in the SPD405-319 study.

    About FOSRENOL® (lanthanum carbonate)

  • FOSRENOL is indicated:
    o In the EU as a phosphate binding agent for use in the control of hyperphosphataemia in chronic renal failure patients on haemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.8
    o In the US to reduce serum phosphorus in patients with end stage renal disease.9
  • FOSRENOL is not available in all countries and prescribing information may differ between countries.  Please consult your local prescribing information.
  • FOSRENOL works by binding to dietary phosphate in the GI tract; once bound, the lanthanum/phosphate complex cannot pass through the intestinal lining into the blood stream and is eliminated from the body.8 As a consequence, overall phosphate absorption from the diet is decreased significantly.
  • FOSRENOL is available in a broad range of dosage strengths including 500mg, 750mg, and 1000mg tablets8 which facilitates an effective dosing regimen of one tablet per meal for the majority of patients. 
  • FOSRENOL was first approved in Sweden in March 2004, and by the US FDA in October 2004. FOSRENOL was subsequently approved in all EU markets by the European Mutual Recognition Procedure and is now launched in 37 markets worldwide. It continues to be approved and made available in new markets around the world. 

    Important Safety Information

    Patients with renal insufficiency may develop hypocalcaemia.  Serum calcium levels should therefore be monitored at regular time intervals for this patient population and appropriate supplements given.

    No data are available in patients with severe hepatic impairment.  Caution should, therefore, be exercised in these patients, as elimination of absorbed lanthanum may be reduced.

    FOSRENOL should not be used during pregnancy.

    Patients with acute peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease or bowel obstruction were not included in clinical studies with FOSRENOL.

    The most commonly reported Adverse Drug Reactions are gastrointestinal reactions, such as abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhoea, dyspepsia, flatulence, nausea and vomiting. These are minimized by taking FOSRENOL with food and generally abate with time with continued dosing. Hypocalcaemia was the only other commonly reported adverse reaction. Full prescribing information is available on request.

    Shire plc

    Shire’s strategic goal is to become the leading specialty biopharmaceutical company that focuses on meeting the needs of the specialist physician.  Shire focuses its business on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, human genetic therapies and gastrointestinal diseases as well as opportunities in other therapeutic areas to the extent they arise through acquisitions.  Shire’s in-licensing, merger and acquisition efforts are focused on products in specialist markets with strong intellectual property protection and global rights.  Shire believes that a carefully selected and balanced portfolio of products with strategically aligned and relatively small-scale sales forces will deliver strong results.

    For further information on Shire, please visit the Company’s website: www.shire.com.

    References

    1. Hutchison AJ, Barnett EM, Krause R, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety profile of lanthanum carbonate: results for up to 6 years of treatment. Nephron Clin Pract. 2008. 110(1): p. c15-23.

    2. Chertow GM, Burke SK, and Raggi P. Sevelamer attenuates the progression of coronary and aortic calcification in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002. 62(1): p. 245-252.

    3. Dacon Report. Intercontinental Medical Statistic.; March 2006.

    4. Sprague SM, Ross EA, Krause R, et al. Lanthanum carbonate vs sevelamer hydrochloride for the reduction of serum phosphorus in hemodialysis patients: a crossover study. Clin Nephrol. 2009; 72(4): 252-258.

    5. Moe SM, Block GA, Cannata-Andía JB, et al. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney Int Suppl. 2009 Aug;(113):S1-130.

    6. Danese MD, Belozeroff V, Smirnakis K and Rothman KJ. Consistent control of mineral and bone disorder in incident hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3(5): 1423-1429.

    7. Kim J, Pisoni RL, Danese MD, et al. Achievement of proposed NKF-K/DOQI Bone Metabolism and Disease Guidelines: Results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 269A, 2003.

    8. Shire plc. FOSRENOL EU SmPC.  Last revised July 2008.

    9. Shire plc. FOSRENOL US PIL. Last revised April 2008.

    "SAFE HARBOR" STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
    Statements included herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties and are subject to change at any time. In the event such risks or uncertainties materialize, the Company’s results could be materially adversely affected. The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks associated with: the inherent uncertainty of research, development, approval, reimbursement, manufacturing and commercialization of the Company’s Specialty Pharmaceutical and Human Genetic Therapies products, as well as the ability to secure and integrate new products for commercialization and/or development; government regulation of the Company’s products; the Company’s ability to manufacture its products in sufficient quantities to meet demand; the impact of competitive therapies on the Company’s products; the Company’s ability to register, maintain and enforce patents and other intellectual property rights relating to its products; the Company’s ability to obtain and maintain government and other third-party reimbursement for its products; and other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

  • 07 Oct 2009 Data from a head-to-head crossover study evaluating FOSRENOL® and sevelamer published today (38KB PDF)

    « Back to Shire news

    Did you know...

    You can sign up to receive email and SMS alerts so that you can keep up to speed with our latest news.

    Email and SMS alerts

    Did you know...

    We donated over $35,000 in
    outdated laboratory
    equipment
    to local
    schools?